1. Specifying the format shouldn’t be associated with the act of saving the file to disk.
而不是磁盘文件的特征,指定文件的格式不应该和保存文件到磁盘的操作相关。

-- 来源 -- About Face 3交互设计精髓

2. The next time the user enters a date, which format should the application use?
下次用户输入一个日期,程序应该用哪种格式呢?

-- 来源 -- About Face 3交互设计精髓

3. Specifying the stored format
指定文档的存储格式

-- 来源 -- About Face 3交互设计精髓

4. The format used 50 times or the more recent one-time format?
蜗嗤娜掌诟袷剑故亲罱娜掌诟袷剑

-- 来源 -- About Face 3交互设计精髓

5. Overriding the format of a file is a relatively rare occurrence. Saving a file is a very common occurrence. These two functions should not be combined.
很少发生改变文件物理格式的情况,保存文件是很普遍的情况,这两个功能不应该结合。

-- 来源 -- About Face 3交互设计精髓

6. How many times must the new format be specified before it becomes the default?
一种新格式在成为默认格式之前应该使用多少次?

-- 来源 -- About Face 3交互设计精髓

7. For example, take the calendar. In the nondigital world, calendars are made of paper and are usually divided up into a one-month-per-page format.
以日历为例,在非数字化世界里,日历由纸张制作,并且通常以每月一页的格式分割。

-- 来源 -- About Face 3交互设计精髓

8. Designers start to imagine situations like this: The user accepts the same date format 50 times in a row, and then manually enters a different format once.
设计师开始想像这样的情况:用户在一行中连续50次接受相同的日期格式,然后手工输入一次不同的格式。

-- 来源 -- About Face 3交互设计精髓

9. By tying the format to the act of saving, users are confronted with additional, unnecessary complexity added to saving.
通过将物理格式与保存行为捆绑在一起,用户在保存时遇到了额外而不必要的麻烦。

-- 来源 -- About Face 3交互设计精髓

10. Selections like View, Insert, Format, Tools, and Options sound like tools and functions, not goals.
像“视图”、“插入”、“格式”和“选项”这样的选择听上去像工具和功能,而不是目标。

-- 来源 -- About Face 3交互设计精髓